[logo]
IF-Review
The Online Interactive Fiction Review Site


Earn $20!Current ReviewGame ListAuthor ListReviewer ListRecent Reviews

 
Three
Review by: Blueman Steele
Game: Attack of the Yeti Robot Zombies
By: Øyvind Thorsby

Related Links
Game file
Info at Baf's guide

IFWiki
SPAG review

Attack of the Yeti Robot Zombies by Øyvind Thorsby is a set in Norway, 1994, with the country overrun by, you guessed it, yeti robot zombies. You quickly acquire a weapon with which you will not have enough ammunition to win the game, so you must find other means to vanquish the yeti. That is not a spoiler as you are told this when you get the weapon. You are also told that it is a "try-to-win-on-the-first-attempt game". I know you'll join me in saying ... huh? But, we will get back to that.

Attack of the Yeti Zombies is a short game. At least it was for me as I did not try again after I died. Perhaps if I'd not been encouraged to try-to-win-on-the-first-attempt I might have tried again. Blatant attempts to annoy the player such as having a ring of keys that must be tried on doors at random provide little incentive to go on. You run between caves and small white rooms and at least more that one "yet another small white room".

The descriptions were functional, but certainly did not transport me to Norway. The ability to examine objects is removed from the game, presumably to save the author the trouble of creating any descriptions.

Did I mention it's a "try-to-win-on-the-first-attempt game"?

Since I don't ever play to lose, it's arguable that I play every game as a "try-to-win-on-the-first-attempt game". The game was very quick to tell me to do so. When asked "Get it? Yes or no?" I honestly said no and was treated to an elaborate explanation, which I didn't understand. Dedicating two paragraphs at the beginning of the game asking me to "try-to-win-on-the-first-attempt" seemed to be a bit much, but when I continued to be perplexed the game announced.

"Well I give up. Just play the game."

Why, thank you, I did. But I'd not recommend that others do.

Favorite phrases: "An extremely dead soldier lies all over the floor"

"Another dead soldier lies all over the place."

>unlock door
You try one of the keys. It does not fit.

>g
You try another key. It does not fit.

>g
You try a new key. It does not fit.

>g
You try a new key. It does not fit.

>g
You try a new key. It fits. What luck! You unlock the door.


Review by: Paul O'Brian
Game: Attack of the Yeti Robot Zombies
By: Øyvind Thorsby

Attack Of The Yeti Robot Zombies announces two facts right upfront. First, it is a "try-to-win-on-the-first-attempt game", which means that while SAVE, RESTORE, and UNDO have not been disabled, players are honor-bound not to use them. Secondly, the game tells us that "Examine, look at, look inside, look under, look behind, look <direction> and search have not been implemented." I was surprised to discover that the latter aspect threw me off much more than the former one did. It turns out that examining things is so ingrained into my IF approach that having that feature disabled made me feel like an amputee. Frequently, I would try to examine an item before being reminded: no, that limb is missing. Taken together, what these features present us with a game in which the crossword has decisively defeated the narrative, to use Graham Nelson's terms.

AOTYRZ presents a world, but it's only scraps of clothing over otherwise bare puzzles. The title monsters are a perfect example of this. What on earth could a "Yeti Robot Zombie" be? A cybernetic duplicate of an Abominable Snowman who was killed and then revived to be even more mindless than it was before? Is there any universe in which that makes sense? Aren't "robot" and "zombie" mutually exclusive categories, since something that was never alive can't be killed and brought back to life? The game doesn't know, and it doesn't care. It might as well be called "Attack Of The Generic Monster Placeholders," because that's all that the YRZs are. If you don't believe me, just try examining one.

So, given that this is a puzzle game whose story is sputtering and gasping for breath, how are the puzzles? Mixed, I'm afraid. I took the "win-on-the-first-attempt" rule rather seriously, and ended up feeling quite disappointed at the number of times I had to learn the game's mechanics by dying. Now, in its defense, AOTYRZ does go some reasonable distance towards making the game winnable on the first try. Similar to Wishbringer (though quite a bit cruder), it gives the player a resource which can be used as an alternative solution for all the puzzles. This resource can only be used a limited number of times — fewer than the number of puzzles — which means that some of the puzzles must be solved in order to win on the first attempt. That's not too bad though, because some of the puzzles are pretty easy.

However, unlike Wishbringer, it is impossible to win the game (near as I can tell, anyway) without using that resource a couple of times. There's no way to know this fact in advance without some outside information, which throws a serious obstacle into the path of anybody trying to win on the first attempt. The game chided me every time I used the resource rather than finding the cleverer solution, and after a couple of rounds of this, I felt the message was clear: there will always be a better solution available, so I should always figure it out and use it. Then, a few puzzles later, the game hit me with a situation for which there was no better solution. Even worse, this situation was so thinly implemented that it almost seemed to be a bug rather than a change-up. It was there that my first attempt at AOTYRZ ended in ignominious death.

From that point forward, since I had to restore, I tried some alternative solutions, and found that while some were rather nifty and scrupulously fair, others were impossible to use without either knowledge from a prior life or some pretty lucky guesses. Also, a note to game designers: if something is chasing me, and you block my path with something I can move, please allow me to use that something to block the door behind me. Thank you.

Once it wasn't my first attempt anymore, I started having a lot more fun with AOTYRZ. Yeah, it's a bare puzzle game, but some of the puzzles are pretty snappy, and the plot (such as it is) moves along at an enjoyable clip. In addition, while the game world's implemenation is necessarily sparse due to the absence of EXAMINE, what's there is competently constructed — I didn't find a single bug. The writing isn't quite as flawless. There are a number of typos, some of which serve up some unintentional (but very funny) comedy. My favorite comes in a cutscene where the PC is receiving remote instructions from a guide:

"The teleporter worked." you say in the phone.
"It did? Really? That's great! Now walk up the stairs and you will find two doors. It doesn't matter which one you take, both will lead to a roof."
"Then what?"
"On each roof there will be a helicopter. I assume you know how to fly one?"
"Off course."

Oh, well is there anybody there who can fly a helicopter without going off course? Anyway, those moments aside, the writing serves its purpose well enough. I can't muster a huge amount of enthusiasm for AOTYRZ — it takes a pretty audacious approach and then fails to provide a sufficient follow-through. However, if you don't mind an IF world with no depth and you don't worry too much about really winning on the first attempt, the game can provide a pleasant diversion for an hour or two.


Review by: Dan Shiovitz
Game: Attack of the Yeti Robot Zombies
By: Øyvind Thorsby

[Ed note: this has been reprinted from http://www.drizzle.com/~dans/if/reviews.html#yeti with permission]

As you have probably noticed if you've been reading my reviews for a while, I am a big wimp as an IF player. I hate games that I can accidentally make unwinnable, games with time limits, games where I get stuck, games with puzzles that don't make sense and, generally speaking, any games that are not presented to me on a platter surrounded by a few sprigs of watercress. So you would naturally expect that I wouldn't like Attack of the Yeti Robot Zombies — it's a game where the author tells you from the start that you're not supposed to save or undo, you're just supposed to try to win in one playthrough. Making this harder, you're surrounded by the enemies hinted at in the title, and you've only got a gun with a very limited number of shots.

But the thing is, despite all those things that I listed above that I dislike, there is one thing I love more than anything else in an IF game, and that is a game that knows what it is about and does it whole-heartedly. It takes balls as an IF author to go against the conventions of modern IF, and it takes skill as a designer to make something that's playable under these restrictions.

All things considered, Thorsby does a pretty good job. There's one puzzle that I, even on a replay, can't see how the player is supposed to figure out the optimal solution to, but there's just enough slack in the number of shots the PC has in their gun to force people to solve most of the puzzles but still let them kulcad their way past the ones they can't figure out. Given that there's virtually no inventory in this game and only a very few implemented commands, it's impressive that the author is able to work up so different many situations where there's a zombie coming to kill you and you have to work out how to evade or dispose of them. Probably it helps that Attack of the Yeti Robot Zombies is quite short — a playthrough shouldn't take more than fifteen or twenty minutes — and written in a cheerful FPS-parody style. In any case, you'll be amused, and when you see the >AMUSING notes at the end you'll want to replay, and what more can an author shoot for?


  Geo Visitors Map


This site Copyright 2001-2012 by Mark J. Musante. All Rights Reserved
Individual reviews are copyrighted by their respective authors.